RESUMEN
Purpose: Describe outcomes of patients (pt) with pre-tx COVID-19. Method(s): Multicenter study of SOT/HCT candidates who had a positive (pos) SARS-CoV-2 PCR pre-tx. Result(s): Pre-tx: Of 208 pt, median age was 56 (range 3-76). 87.8% were SOT candidates (40.5% kidney, 40.5% liver, 9.8% lung, 6.9% heart, 2.3% pancreas) and 13.9% were HCT candidates (54.2% allo, 45.8% auto). Pt underwent a median of 2 tests (range 1 - 14). In 41% of pt, > 1 neg PCR was required by the tx center before reactivation. Neg PCR was documented in 67.4% of pt at a median of 41 days (18-68) after pos PCR. Waitlist mortality was 11.0%;deaths were due to COVID-19 in 60% (12/20). Post-tx (all pt): 78 pt underwent tx at a median of 65.5 days (range 17-324) from COVID-19;71/78 have completed 4-weeks of follow-up. 24/78 (30.7%) pt were still PCR pos at time of tx (details below). 54/78 (69.2%) pt underwent routine PCR testing post-tx;62% were tested regularly for 8 weeks. Only 1 pt, who remained asymptomatic, developed recurrent pos PCR on surveillance testing 18 days post-tx. 1 pt had graft loss. There were no deaths at 4 weeks post-tx. Pt transplanted without a negative PCR: 24 pt with COVID-19 did not have neg PCR at time of tx: 9 (37.5%) kidney, 9 (37.5%) liver, 2 (8.3%) SLK, 1 (4.2%) lung, 1 heart (4.2%), 2 auto-HSCT (8.3%), 2 allo-HSCT (8.3%). Of 24 pt who were reactivated at a median of 21 days (range 8 - 38) from COVID-19 diagnosis, 7 underwent tx emergently (5 liver, 1 lung, 1 heart). 20/24 completed 4-weeks of follow-up;all were alive. PCR Cycle thresholds (Ct) increased over time, suggesting a reduction in SARS-CoV-2 viral loads with time elapsed since COVID-19 diagnosis. Conclusion(s): Short-term outcomes of transplantation in SOT/HCT candidates with prior COVID-19 were promising in this small cohort, even with a positive PCR going into transplant. Whether documentation of a negative PCR should be required for all tx candidates with a history of COVID-19 prior to transplantation should be investigated further, particularly among lung tx candidates. For certain tx candidates with COVID-19, relying time-based strategy instead of a test-based strategy may be safe.
RESUMEN
Purpose: We report the first two pediatric liver transplants utilizing allografts from COVID+ donors, infected at time of organ procurement, demonstrating a pivotal step toward donor pool maximization amid a viral pandemic with poorly understood transmissibility in the pediatric patient. Method(s): This is a prospective and retrospective review of two pediatric liver transplants and their donors who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at time of procurement. Data was obtained through the electronic medical record system and UNet DonorNet platform. Result(s): The first donor is a 3-year-old male succumbing to head trauma. 1 of 5 nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR tests demonstrated COVID-19 positivity while 1 of 3 bronchoalveolar lavage RT-PCR tests indicated SARS-CoV-2 infection. Preceding procurement in the second donor, a 16-month-old male with unknown etiology of cardiorespiratory arrest, 2 nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR tests and 1 bronchoalveolar lavage RT-PCR test failed to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. Diagnosis was not made until the Medical Examiner's office repeated a nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR and archive plasma RT-PCR which were both positive for SARS-CoV-2. The two 2-yearold pediatric liver recipients underwent transplantation in November 2021. Continued follow-up demonstrates successful transplant void of viral transmission or hepatic artery thrombosis as liver chemistries have anticipatorily normalized with excellent graft function. One recipient experienced early portal vein thrombosis treated by interventional radiology with discharge on postoperative day 20. Conclusion(s): This report is the first to describe successful pediatric liver transplants from COVID+ donors. This data reinforces case reports in the adult transplant population of successful use of COVID + donor organs and further supports the judicious use of COVID+ donors for extrapulmonary pediatric organ transplant. The concern for donor-derived transmission must now be weighed against the realized benefit of successful, life-saving transplantation for end stage liver disease in the pediatric patient. (Figure Presented).
RESUMEN
Purpose: The OPTN DTAC, a multidisciplinary group, evaluates potential donor derived transmission events (PDDTE) to assess the likelihood of disease transmission. Method(s): Retrospective study of PDDTE cases reported to the OPTN between 01/20 and 12/20. DTAC reviewed cases using a standardized classification algorithm. Result(s): During 2020, there were 18,318 donors and 37,583 unique recipients. DTAC reviewed 261/427 PDDTE from donor (111) or recipient (150) findings. 64/261 (25%) donors had proven/probable transmission (P/P Tr) of infection, malignancies or other to 84/206 (41%) exposed recipients [figure]. 12 involved living donors. Infection occurred with 44/64 P/P cases affecting 63 recipients. Viruses were most frequent P/P infections with 29 recipients having P/P Tr from 19 donors. COVID-19 PDDTE represented 11% (29/261) of all cases reviewed involving 29 donors and 15 lung and 76 non-lung recipients. One lung recipient had P/P Tr and died;none of the non-lung recipients developed P/P Tr. For bacteria, 20 recipients had P/P Tr from 14 donors. Deaths from infection (N=10) occurred at a median of 20 days (5-89 days). Attributable death was highest for fungal (4/12, 33%) and bacterial infections (6/20, 30%). 7 donors with malignancies were classified as P/P impacting 15 recipients with 1 attributable death. 53 non-infection, non-malignancy PDDTE were reported;13 resulted in P/P Tr to 14 recipients. Conclusion(s): Although P/P events remain rare, 1/4 reviewed cases resulted in unanticipated P/P Tr. This is a conservative estimate due to passive reporting and empiric interventions. In 29 COVID-19 PDDTE only 1 lung recipient had P/P Tr. The DTAC continues to evaluate PDDTE to maximize organ use and minimize the risk of transmission. (Table Presented).
RESUMEN
Purpose: Decision to transplant organs from SARS-CoV-2 NAT+ donors(N+D) balances risk of donor-derived infection with the scarcity of available organs to meet the needs of waitlisted candidates. Method(s): OPTN Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) reports on the use of organs from N+D from the onset of required SARS-CoV-2 lower respiratory tract(LRT) testing for lung donors (May 27, 2021) through August 31, 2021. OPTN data were analyzed for donors with a positive LRT or upper respiratory tract (URT) test reported in DonorNet discrete data fields (N+D), compared with donors who did not have positive LRT or URT in the discrete data fields (N-D). Result(s): Organs were recovered from 120 N+D (all OPTN Regions and 40/57 OPOs (70%)). Median donor age was 42 (IQR: 32-52) for N+D and 43 (30-56) for N-D. There was a greater proportion of DCD N+D than N-D (37.5% vs 28.3%, p=0.04). Underlying COD of anoxia and other were different (N+D 31.7%, 16.7% vs N-D 48%, 2.7%, respectively). Transplanted N+D and N-D did not differ by KDPI, LDRI or LVEF for kidney(KT), liver(LT) or heart(HT), respectively (Table 1). Median time from donor admission to first reported test (any result) was 0 and 4 days for URT and LRT, respectively. N+D recovery occurred a median of 2 (IQR: 1-6) days from last positive test. 246 organs (152KT, 50LT, 22HT, 22other) were transplanted from 107 N+D compared to 8969 organs from 3348 N-D. Recipients from N+D and N-D were similar in age, MELD/PELD (LT) and medical urgency status (HT). Median time from listing to transplant similar for N+D for all organs. The match run sequence number for final acceptor was higher for N+D for all organ types (Table 2). Median length of stay was similar for N+D and N-D for KT and LT (5d and 12-13d, respectively). For HT, median stay was shorter for N+D (30 vs 34d). For N+D, 3 of 50 LT died within 30d of transplant. During this timeframe, no PDDTEs were reported for any N+D at the time of transplant. Conclusion(s): N+D and N-D were similar in terms organ quality characteristics. Recipients receiving organs from N+D had higher match run sequence numbers, suggesting use of organs from N+D is not widespread across centers;however, with small numbers, this data will need to be verified. We cannot assess the relatedness of the three early mortality events in N+D recipients to donor or recipient characteristics. However, these data highlight the importance of ongoing outcome review of N+D recipients. (Figure Presented).
RESUMEN
Background. Most individuals diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 are no longer infectious after day 10 of symptom onset and those with severe or critical illness from COVID are typically not infection after day 20 day of symptom onset. Recovered persons can continue to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR via detection of non-viable RNA in nasopharyngeal specimens for up to three months (or longer) after illness onset. It is also know known that severely immunocompromised patients may produce replication-competent virus greater than 20 days from symptom onset and may require, per CDC recommendations, "additional testing and consultation with infectious diseases specialists and infection control experts". We aim to discuss four case studies of severely immunocompromised patients who exhibited signs of persistent COVID-19 infection of COVID and how we managed transmission-based precautions in our hospital through sequencing and evaluation of cycle thresholds (CT) values and subgenomic RNA detection. Methods. Residual nasopharyngeal (NP) samples were collected on patients exhibiting persistent COVID like symptoms. These samples underwent N gene and N gene subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing. Results. Analysis of longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 sequence data demonstrated within-patient virus evolution, including mutations in the receptor binding domain and deletions in the N-terminal domain of the spike protein, which have been implicated in antibody escape. See Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1. Timelines of Identified Patients 1 and 2 Patient 1: 46-year-old woman with recently diagnosed stage IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma for which she was treated with 2 cycles of R-CHOP. Patient 2: 38-year-old woman with history of myelodysplastic syndrome, peripheral blood stem cell transplant with chronic graft versus host disease of the GI tract, skin, and eyes as well as CMV enteritis, and she was maintained on rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and monthly IVIG without recent changes to her immunosuppression. Figure 2. Timeline of Identified Patients 3 and 4 Patient 3: 44 year-old man with prior history of thymoma s/p thymectomy Patient 4: 46 year-old man who was initially diagnosed with marginal zone lymphoma approximately 2.5 years ago. He was initially treated with bendamustine and rituximab and achieved remission. He was then continued on maintenance rituximab without significant complications for a planned two years. Conclusion. Differentiating between prolonged viral shedding of non-infectious RNA and persistent replicating viable virus can be difficult to determine without full evaluation of a patient's clinical picture and timeline. Consultation between laboratory, infectious diseases, and infection prevention experts to provide appropriate level of guidance for precautions and treatment may be warranted. Testing by PCR and analysis of CT values may provide key findings of viral replication in immunocompromised hosts, indicating the need for evaluation of additional treatment and maintaining isolation status in healthcare settings.
RESUMEN
Purpose: US Solid organ transplantation rates significantly decreased during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The concern for potential donor derived COVID-19 was one of many contributing factors. We describe the early experience of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) investigations. Methods: COVID-19 cases reported to DTAC between January 2020 and October 2020 as potential donor-derived transmission events (PPDTE) were included. All of the events were investigated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and adjudicated by the DTAC based on consensus definitions. Results: Eighteen PDTE COVID-19 events were reported during the study period. 12 PDTE reports have completed DTAC adjudication (Table 1). These included 12 donors with 44 recipients. Ten investigations were initiated by the transplant center due to recipient testing (36 total recipients). The median time to presentation in these index cases was 11 days (IQR 7-16). Nine donors in these events (35 recipients) had a prospective or retrospective pre-recovery negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR result. In all of these events, the index recipient had either a possible or confirmed community or hospital exposure. In one recipient index case (5 total recipients), the positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR result post-transplant was ultimately deemed a false positive and considered not a case by the committee. Two investigations were initiated by an OPO (8 recipients). In both events, the OPO performed SARS-CoV-2 PCR was negative, but a post-procurement nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR performed by the tissue collector was reported as positive and retrospectively deemed false positives. None of these recipients developed COVID-19;the events were adjudicated as not cases. Conclusions: The initial DTAC experience reflecting the early pandemic era emphasizes the need to implement hospital prevention measures to avoid nosocomial transmission, provide patient education to avoid community exposure and to recognize the possibility of post-procurement SARS-CoV-2 false positive testing. Vigilance for the possibility of a SARS-CoV-2 donor derived event remains important as the pandemic continues. (Table Presented) .